香港新浪網 MySinaBlog
« 上一篇 | 下一篇 »
Element+司徒志誠 | 14th Dec 2007 | 香港時政 | (1437 Reads)

司徒志誠

Picture 

陳太上星期首日出席立法會會議﹐遭民政事務局局長曾德成批評「忽然民生」。

Element認為「曾德成的言論﹐其立場也可以看成是中央政府的立場」﹐我則不以為然。或許有人會猜想﹐曾局長是在某種「授權」的情況下﹐要向陳太「擺官威」。然而﹐從電視片段中看到﹐曾德成的言論完全是「興之所致」﹐似乎是情緒按奈不住的結果。不過﹐先不論二人的言論是否正確﹐或者是否有人「授權」﹐曾局長選擇在陳太剛上任便作出批評﹐明顯是缺乏政治智慧。

作為問責局長﹐是應該「沉默是金」的。因為在香港現時出現的政治角力的情況下﹐香港的媒體事實上都有不同的政治取向。曾局長公開批評陳太﹐便很容易受到親反對派的媒體和時事評論員「大造文章」﹐尤其是陳太剛剛勝出補選﹐大家的焦點仍放在陳太身上的時候。無疑﹐曾局長的批評﹐將會對他的形象帶來負面影響。

其次﹐從實際角度來看﹐曾局長的批評根本完全是「口舌之爭」。在立法會議事堂上﹐不論議員發表甚麼言論﹐其言論是否胡說八道﹐其實都不會對政府現行所厘定的政策﹐產生任何影響﹐可以說是無關重要。坦白說﹐陳太發表的言論﹐曾局長可以完全無視﹐不作任何回應。何況﹐陳太在補選中雖然贏了﹐但泛民主派在立法會的議席其實只增加一席﹐仍未超過半數。難聽點說﹐陳太是不是進了立法會﹐對政府的提案能否在立法會通過﹐根本是「無關痛痒」。既然她發言的內容對政府實際施政無關重要﹐陳太在立法會根本無關痛痒﹐曾局長為甚麼還要對她作出批評﹖這不是「口舌之爭」﹐是甚麼﹖

更愚笨的是﹐曾德成似乎忘記了愛爾蘭詩人王爾德的一番話﹕「世上只有一種情況比被人提及更壞﹐便是沒有被人提及」(The only thing worse than being talked about is not being talked about.)。在香港政壇裡﹐問責官員應該沉默是金﹐盡量不要被傳媒提及﹐不過民選議員則是相反。問責局長的實權則是源於特首任命的﹐他們不會因為社會知名度和傳媒曝光率低而失去政治權力。民選立法會議員則不一樣﹐尤其是在現今香港的選舉文化底下﹐他們的社會知名度和傳媒曝光率低﹐便會被市民遺忘﹐便等於「選票流失」。因此﹐對民選立法會議員來說﹐沒有一件事比沒傳媒報導更悲慘。

其實從陳太宣佈參選時的言論﹐聲稱參選是「為了釋放更多的政治能量」﹐我們便理解到陳太參選﹐便是害怕「沒有被人提及」﹐害怕被人無視她。陳太既然投身泛民主派﹐而泛民主派又是反對派﹐她便是現任政府的政敵。陳太可以參選和勝出﹐其實很大程度建基於她的知名度﹐她要在立法會中「釋放更多政治能量」﹐亦只有靠不斷被傳媒報導她在立法會的一舉一動。既然陳太是現任政府的政敵﹐曾德成又是現任政府的問責高官﹐而陳太那番言論根本對政府施政無關痛痒﹐為何要給她和傳媒一個製造新聞的好機會﹖

希望曾德成﹑或者是後來跳出來為曾德成辯護的梁振英﹐乃至整個政府領導班子﹐應該明白泛民主派的議員最害怕的﹐便是王爾德這句說話﹐而他們在議事堂中的所作所為﹐都只不過是一場「政治秀」﹐並不能對政府施政帶來甚麼實際性的衝擊。爆發這類罵戰﹐對政府只會百害而無一利。因此﹐面對他們的最佳方法﹐便是盡量無視他們的存在﹐因為這個世界﹐一隻手掌是拍不響的。


[1]

I fully agree with your comments in your blog. But I see such issue in different angle. Please note Mr. Tseng was one of the victims of the Anson Chan during her colonial rule. He is also a human, he has his emotion and his bitter memories of being suppressed by the colonialist.

We want the govt officials to be human, not a machine; they have their likes and dislikes, that’s normal. Now the oppositions are making such issues to criticise Mr. Tseng personally, I think this is not fair.

Please note the comment of Mr. Tseng on Anson Chan was clear, sharp and appropriate; like a sword to the throat, that’s why she had no chance to bounce back except claiming being a “victim”. Certainly, for show business, she knows how to play the game better than Mr. Tseng.

She is only 1/60 and now she has the focus more than anyone. She is making use of such event to make herself in focus, in way to cover up her inability and inconsistence.

Sorry for this feedback in English as my computer cannot write Chinese.


[引用] | 作者 hargaw | 14th Dec 2007 | [舉報垃圾留言]

[2]

hargaw﹐
我明白﹐所以我才說﹐曾局長的言論是「按奈不住」。然而﹐問責局長是政治人物﹐頭腦發熱是一種政治失誤﹐在政治博弈的態勢下﹐出現政治失誤只會吃虧﹐甚至將之前建立正面的政治形象摧毀。
作為政治人物﹐形象是最重要的﹐曾德成上任時﹐建立了開明左派的形象﹐如今竟因為一時「按奈不住」而受到破壞﹐還要因為一個政治上是無關重要﹑無關痛痒的人而受到破壞﹐值得嗎﹖

Element+司徒志誠
[引用] | 作者 Element+司徒志誠 | 15th Dec 2007 | [舉報垃圾留言]

[3]

I fully agree with you. Anyway, Mr. Tseng is new to politics and he has more to learn. He should not damage his image to such smiling machine. On the other hand, I like his style to speak it out straight. He gives me an impression that he is a human, not a smiling machine. I am now not residing in HK and I do not know both of them. Only I know is the smiling machine as lots of papers are talking about her, saying she is the conscience of HK. I always feel very sick when I read such comment, like being raped by an old lady. (hope you would not mind such wordings)

Another question coming up. What do we expect our officials and politicians: a human being, with characters of likes and dislikes, or smiling machine that you will never what she thinks (sure everybody knows for power)?

I read some of your previous articles and enjoy very much some of them. Keep posting some interesting articles. Certainly, you may see me sometimes on certain objects.

Thanks a lot for your efforts so far.


[引用] | 作者 hargaw | 15th Dec 2007 | [舉報垃圾留言]

[4]

我不認同局長是politician,佢同啲常秘、乜O一樣都係公僕嘅一份子,只不過聘用條件唔同,所以局長最好攪清楚自己個角色先。至於"character"同"image",我會話佢係呢台戲嘅一個"character",個"image"係"created"配合劇情需要啫,不過今次可能臨時爆肚!


[引用] | 作者 OLY | 15th Dec 2007 | [舉報垃圾留言]

[5]

hargaw:

閣下稱陳太為"smiling machine"﹐但她的正面政治形象﹐就正正是她的"四萬"笑容。如大家重看以往的新聞片段﹐陳太是福利署署長時﹐並不是這樣的﹐據聞是她上任時由鵬督提點她﹐才有今天的"四萬"...或許你可以說她的"四萬"有點虛偽﹐但她的笑容卻真的能予人一種討好的形象﹐情況就正如你初相識一個人﹐如她讓你覺得木訥或者"臭寸"﹐你根本沒有意欲令他變成你的深交...

控制自己的脾氣﹐不代表你不真誠﹐而是基本的人情世故。你可以很憤怒或不滿﹐但如果在不適合的場合宣泄出來﹐人家也會覺得你不懂人情世故...儘管是受了冤屈﹐受到挑舋﹐但如果不懂用方法化解的話﹐吃虧的也是你自己。

而我今次所說的﹐是一個更高的層次﹐就是作為一個政治人物﹐應該了解對方行為的動機﹐避免跌入圈套。你個性率直﹐但利用你性格的弱點﹐來陷你於不義﹐或者達到他所求的目的。如果你不知道的話﹐就是政治道行未夠班﹐如果你知對方用激將法﹐但你還要中計的話﹐你就是蠢了。直接點說﹐我的文章就是希望能點醒他們﹐包括還為此事擾攘的左派頭面人物...你鬧吧﹐你鬧吧﹐他們就是想你暴跳如雷。

Element+司徒志誠
[引用] | 作者 Element+司徒志誠 | 16th Dec 2007 | [舉報垃圾留言]

[6]

OLY:
在問責制下﹐局長是由特首和中央任命的﹐這是一項政治任命;常秘是公務員體系的﹐問責局長不是﹐所以局長不是公僕﹐是政治人物。問責局長的任務就是維持現屆政府有效施政﹐這項任務中其中一個重點﹐就是維持現屆政府的管治威信。甚麼是管治威信﹖就是維持政府民望。民望由甚麼來支持的﹖就是整個政府管治班子給予群眾的形象﹖

如回閣下的話語﹐這次事件的問題﹐就是衰「爆肚」。好端端可以不理她﹐為何要「爆肚」﹖

Element+司徒志誠
[引用] | 作者 Element+司徒志誠 | 16th Dec 2007 | [舉報垃圾留言]

[7] 暴力的神

夥計就係夥計,老細係永冇當過夥計係「囂民」架。你代表得公司去開會,你就已經唔係你,知冇!
「暴力的神」唔係人人都有資格做,就連憎暗權都未夠班。
我亦都知佢係新仔,所以咪要大大聲鬧醒佢囉,掛「P」牌係冇用架,一定要揸車睇路呀。


[引用] | 作者 九龍居民 | 17th Dec 2007 | [舉報垃圾留言]

[8] 兵變總動员令

曾德成, 中共狂徒曾德成 , 你 ! 以暴動 , 杀人发家 , ok, ok, 今日二郎神就開始成全你 , 幫助你永遠舒服 !


[引用] | 作者 二郎神 | 17th Dec 2007 | [舉報垃圾留言]

[9]

The golden rule of politics is not to make yourself outstanding but to create traps to your opponents, so that all the accusations go to them and not you. Ordinary people are just like sharks to the blood. They enjoy such moment to see another victims falling into the traps.

Mr. Tseng is still young to such game, so are the other “politicians” from the opposite sides of the Pigeons. They need to learn, how to create troubles for others and at same time to protect themselves not into the traps of others. Politics is like a cruel jungle war game.

I agree with you. Mr. Tseng was too emotional to show a real human (not a “politician”) and therefore the HK public put a lot of accusation on him, without checking his remarks in depth. Nowadays is a packaging world. Everything has a nice and good looking packaging, but hollow inside. Because of that, I like human, no more machine.

Sometimes, I recall those old Cantonese movies whereas good men were always other accusation because of their honesty, bad guys always laughed behind to the stupid move of an honest guy.

To comments from OLY. All people earn their living via political activities can be regarded as politicians, particularly are those people like Mr. Tseng and the smiling machine, one is appointed, one is elected. Everyone is acting the play according to what was already set for them. Mr. Tseng was so lovely that he made the show on his own, though not much appreciated by all the audience.


[引用] | 作者 hargaw | 17th Dec 2007 | [舉報垃圾留言]

[10] Re: 九龍居民
九龍居民 : 夥計就係夥計,老細係永冇當過夥計係「囂民」架。你代表得公司去開會,你就已經唔係你,知冇!「暴力的神」唔係人人都有資格做,就連憎暗權都未夠班。我亦都知佢係新仔,所以咪要大大聲鬧醒佢囉,掛「P」牌係冇用架,一定要揸車睇路呀。

以公司比喻﹐確實正確﹐當你代表公司開會﹐便是公司職員﹐而不是個人﹐這亦是「代表」本來的意思。

至於你說的「暴力的神」﹐我便不太理解。是指政府本來就是暴力機器﹐特首是政府之首﹐所以比喻作「暴力的神」﹖

至於說曾德成是新仔﹐其實他也做了CPU顧問幾年了﹐是政府名符其實的「智囊」來的...總不能懂得出謀顯策﹐卻不懂為官之道吧﹖

司徒志誠
[引用] | 作者 司徒志誠 | 18th Dec 2007 | [舉報垃圾留言]

Next